On December 21, 2022, the Michigan Supreme Court held that the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (“WPA”) protects employees who report that their employer has violated “suspected” laws in a case called Janetsky v. County of Saginaw.  In a first-of-its-kind ruling, the divided Court in Janetsky concluded that an assistant county prosecutor could bring WPA claims against her supervisor who she believed illegally offered a below-minimum plea deal.

According to a bare majority, whether the supervisor’s conduct actually violated state law was not dispositive, because the WPA protects employees who report actual and suspected violations of the law.  Because the assistant county prosecutor presented sufficient evidence to create a question of fact that she suspected that her supervisor violated the law, the Court reversed the lower court’s dismissal of her WPA claim.

In her partial dissent, Chief Justice Elizabeth T. Clement wrote that, whereas the WPA protects a report of a violation or a suspected violation of a law, it does not protect reporting a suspected violation of a suspected law.  Chief Justice Clement explained, “In other words, while the statute accepts uncertainty—a violation need only be suspected to be reportable and protected—this should be construed as factual uncertainty, not legal uncertainty.”  Accordingly, Chief Justice Clement stated that the Court’s ruling will “allow plaintiffs to receive protection for reporting violations of imaginary laws,” something that the Court had never held before and expressly declined to so hold in a 2010 decision.

Janetsky is reflective of a growing and noticeable trend to enhance legal protections for whistleblowers.  As we previously reported here and here, many states have in the past year dramatically expanded whistleblower protections through legislation which not only cover a broader array of conduct, about which a would-be whistleblower can complain, but also provides for greater remedies and lightens the burden of establishing a prima facie case for a would-be whistleblower.  Janetsky lightens that burden even further.  Under most whistleblower retaliation statutes, an employee must establish that they have a “good faith belief,” which involves showing both that they subjectively felt wrongful conduct occurred and that such belief was objectively reasonable.  After Janetsky, the WPA, which already lowered this standard to “suspected” misconduct, now also extends protection to cover a violation of a “suspected” or even imaginary law being violated.  Given the dramatic expansion of whistleblower protections under the WPA and percolating around the country, employers should consult with outside counsel to ensure they are aware of the legal landscape.

Back to Workforce Bulletin Blog

Search This Blog

Blog Editors


Related Services



Jump to Page


Sign up to receive an email notification when new Workforce Bulletin posts are published:

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.