Workforce Bulletin

Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson states that Title VII does not require a plaintiff who is a member of a “majority” group to present “additional background circumstances” as the lower court had held.

In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, petitioner Marlean Ames (“Ames”), a heterosexual woman, claimed that her employer, the Ohio Department of Youth Services, had passed her over for a promotion in favor of a less qualified gay woman. Soon after that, Ames claimed, the Department of Youth Services demoted Ames (and cut her pay) so that a gay man could fill the position rendered vacant by her demotion.

Ames brought suit under Title VII claiming that the Ohio Department of Youth Services had discriminated against her because of her sexual orientation. The District Court granted the Ohio Department of Youth Services summary judgment on the grounds that Ames failed to make a prima facie case of discrimination because “she had not presented evidence of [sufficient] background circumstances.” The lower court had found that, as a member of the “majority group,” i.e., heterosexuals, Ames needed to present evidence of “background circumstances” (referred to by the Court as the “background circumstances rule”) to establish that the defendant was the rare employer that would discriminate against the “majority” group.

As featured in #WorkforceWednesday®: This week, we discuss the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) plan to eliminate the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) and the DOL’s new opinion letter program.

On May 30, 2025, the DOL moved to eliminate the OFCCP, shifting key enforcement duties to other agencies. At the same time, the DOL has launched a new opinion letter program, expanding access beyond the Wage and Hour Division.

Employers must navigate these changes while maintaining compliance with federal, state, and local anti-discrimination laws. Epstein Becker Green attorneys Kim Carter and Paul DeCamp provide their insights into these shifts and their likely future impact on employers.

“ERISA, you’ll need a lawyer for that.” Our practice group’s tagline is meant to be a shorthand for the alphabet soup of laws that apply to employee benefits, including the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Employee benefits compliance has many traps for the unwary and is ever evolving. Below, we have provided a primer on current issues of importance in the employee benefits area to help in-house attorneys identify potential risks, mitigate them, and know when to call an outside ERISA lawyer.

1. What Is Old Is New: Get Your Health Plan Governance in Order

Employers that sponsor self-funded health plans have a host of complicated obligations. There are greater potential legal, regulatory, and fiduciary risks than in years past with managing health plans because of increased congressional legislation, increased Department of Labor (DOL) focus on group health plan compliance, and increased group health plan litigation, often by the same plaintiffs’ firms that have been suing 401(k) plans in fee litigation the past 20 years or more.

As featured in #WorkforceWednesday®: This week, we cover the striking down of abortion protections for workers and LGBTQ harassment guidance, as well as the beginning of a brief EEO-1 reporting season (concluding on June 24).

The New York Retail Worker Safety Act (the “Act”) went into effect  earlier this week, on  June 2, 2025. As we outlined in our recent blog post, the law requires covered retailers to provide certain safety measures for retail store workers, including implementing a written workplace prevention policy and conducting training on the policy. The New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL) has now provided guidance and materials on its website.

New Materials

The NYSDOL guidance includes model materials that employers can use or reference when creating materials required under the Act. The model materials include a model workplace violence prevention policy, an interactive video training program, a text version of the training program, and frequently asked questions (FAQs).

On May 19, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new Civil Rights Fraud Initiative that will leverage the federal False Claims Act (FCA) to investigate and litigate against universities, contractors, health care providers, and other entities that accept federal funds but allegedly violate federal civil rights laws.

The initiative will be led jointly by the DOJ Civil Division’s Fraud Section and the Civil Rights Division—with support from the Criminal Division, federal civil rights agencies, and state partners. 

The initiative implements President Donald Trump’s Executive Order 14173, “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity” (January 21, 2025), directing agencies to combat unlawful discrimination through the FCA, and complements Attorney General (AG) Bondi’s February 5 memorandum, “Ending Illegal DEI and DEIA Discrimination and Preferences.”

As featured in #WorkforceWednesday®: This week, we explore how key changes introduced by President Trump’s Executive Order 14281, “Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy” (“EO 14281”), raise important questions for employers navigating compliance with varying federal, state, and local laws.

EO 14281 poses significant challenges for employers because it seeks to limit disparate impact liability but clashes with established state and local regulations and laws, such as New York City’s law regarding the use of automated employment decision tools. This tension underscores the increasing complexity of managing artificial intelligence (AI)-driven decision-making in the workplace amid shifting legal standards.

On May 20, 2025, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Acting Chair Andrea Lucas announced that the 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection is now open and will close on June 24, 2025. This gives covered employers just five weeks to file.

Overview of EEO-1 Reporting Obligations

The EEO-1 Component 1 Report, also known as the Employer Information Report, is a mandatory annual filing that captures workforce demographic data. Covered private-sector employers with 100 or more employees, and certain federal contractors with 50 or more employees meeting specific criteria, must submit demographic workforce information categorized by job classification, race/ethnicity, and sex. The data is used by the EEOC and, in years past, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) to support enforcement of federal anti-discrimination laws.

Hold your horses—Maryland just added a few more furlongs to its race toward a paid family leave. On May 6, 2025, Governor Wes Moore signed House Bill 102 (“the Amendment”), which again pushes back the start date for Maryland’s Family and Medical Leave Insurance Program (FAMLI). This latest delay came as no surprise, given Maryland Department of Labor’s (MDOL) proposal earlier this year to extend the FAMLI implementation dates, because of the “high degree of instability and uncertainty for Maryland employers and workers” created by recent federal actions.

Dates to Begin Contributions and Use Leave Benefits

As we previously discussed, FAMLI will be funded through contributions from employees and employers with 15 or more employees. Although the Amendment does not alter FAMLI’s funding model, the required payroll deductions, previously scheduled to start on July 1, 2025, will now begin on January 1, 2027. The Maryland Secretary of Labor also now has until March 1, 2026, to set the contribution rates for 2027, and then until November 1st to designate the contribution rate for each subsequent calendar.

Generational shifts in the workplace bring unique challenges and opportunities for employers striving to build productive and engaged teams.

In this one-on-one conversation, Epstein Becker Green attorney Jeff Landes joins George Whipple to explore strategies for managing and motivating the emerging workforce, with a particular focus on “Gen Z” employees. Jeff examines how organizations can adapt to generational expectations, including fostering transparency, providing meaningful feedback, and supporting mental health and wellness initiatives.

The discussion also addresses the evolving dynamics of hybrid and remote work, underscoring the importance of consistent performance management, clear communication, and innovative accommodations. From creating inclusive environments to navigating requests for flexible schedules, Jeff offers practical advice for handling the complexities of a modern workforce while maintaining operational efficiency.

Listen now to gain actionable ideas for workforce development and learn how to create a workplace culture that aligns with both employee needs and business goals.