A recent New York state court decision granted a fairly unique petition to disqualify the attorney for a group of former employees from representing them in an intra-industry arbitration at FINRA. Why? Because the lawyer had turned himself into a fact witness by negotiating the termination explanation in the U5 notice of two of the employees. The decision raises an interesting question about whether the same logic could be applied in a U5 expungement hearing at FINRA when there have been discussions between counsel about the U5 language, regardless of whether ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Video: What Restoring a Quorum at the NLRB Could Mean for Employers - Employment Law This Week
- Video: H-1B Enforcement Tightened, Fertility Benefits Expanded, Gender Identity Protection Setback - Employment Law This Week
- Ohio Enacts Mini-WARN Act: What Employers Need to Know
- Video: Top Employment Insights: 44th Annual Workforce Management Briefing - Employment Law This Week
- Pay Equity in New York City: New Employer Reporting Obligations Likely Coming Soon