A recent New York state court decision granted a fairly unique petition to disqualify the attorney for a group of former employees from representing them in an intra-industry arbitration at FINRA. Why? Because the lawyer had turned himself into a fact witness by negotiating the termination explanation in the U5 notice of two of the employees. The decision raises an interesting question about whether the same logic could be applied in a U5 expungement hearing at FINRA when there have been discussions between counsel about the U5 language, regardless of whether ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- NYDFS Cybersecurity Crackdown: New Requirements Now in Force—Are You Compliant?
- Video: New Tips and Overtime Guidance, NLRB Circuit Split, and Stalled Nomination - Employment Law This Week
- Companies and Employees Increasingly at Risk of AI-Powered Cyber Attacks
- Video: New Leadership and Priorities for the EEOC - Employment Law This Week
- Expanded Pay Transparency Requirements Coming to Columbus, Ohio