A recent New York state court decision granted a fairly unique petition to disqualify the attorney for a group of former employees from representing them in an intra-industry arbitration at FINRA. Why? Because the lawyer had turned himself into a fact witness by negotiating the termination explanation in the U5 notice of two of the employees. The decision raises an interesting question about whether the same logic could be applied in a U5 expungement hearing at FINRA when there have been discussions between counsel about the U5 language, regardless of whether ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- New York City Publishes Final Rules Related to the Earned Safe and Sick Time Act
- Watch: Beyond the EEOC - the Widening Divide in Disparate Impact Enforcement - Employment Law This Week
- The Death of Disparate Impact? What Recent DOJ Guidance Signals to Employers
- Watch: The NLRB Is No Longer Independent—What Employers Need to Know - Employment Law This Week
- Defunding DEI Hits a Legal Wall: Courts Shield Federal Funding Recipients from Biased Artificial Intelligence (AI) Overreach