On May 5, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Wiersum v. U.S. Bank, N.A. (pdf) that the National Bank Act (“NBA”), 12 U.S.C. §24 (Fifth), preempted a bank officer’s state law whistleblower claim that he was wrongfully terminated for opposing the bank’s alleged unlawful conduct. This was a first-impression issue for the Eleventh Circuit, and the majority concluded that the state law claim was preempted because it directly conflicted with the power Congress vested in federally chartered banks to dismiss officers “at pleasure.”
Wiersum, a former Vice ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Video: Whistleblower Challenges and Employer Responses: One-on-One with Alex Barnard
- Video: New DOL Leadership, NLRB Quorum, EEOC Enforcement Priorities - Employment Law This Week
- DEI Executive Orders Are Back in Force with Court of Appeals Ruling
- Ohio Employers, Be Ready: The Paystub Protection Act Takes Effect Soon
- Video: Should Employers Shift Workforce Data Collection Under President Trump? - Employment Law This Week