By Michael Kun
Yesterday, only weeks after its long-awaited Brinker v. Superior Court decision, the California Supreme Court issued another important ruling on California meal and rest period laws.
In Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that neither party may recover attorney’s fees on claims involving meal and rest periods. The Court analyzed the legislative history of the meal and rest period provisions and concluded, “We believe the most plausible inference to be drawn from history is that the Legislature intended [meal and rest period] claims to ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Podcast: 2025 Non-Compete Year in Review – Employment Law This Week
- “Fair Chance” Updates: Philadelphia Employers Soon Face New Screening Restrictions
- EEOC Escalates Enforcement Against DEI Policies
- New York City Council to Mayor: Not So Fast!—Overrides Pay Equity Vetoes
- Video: How Litigation Experience Improves Workplace Solutions: One-on-One with Jill Bigler