By Michael Kun
Yesterday, only weeks after its long-awaited Brinker v. Superior Court decision, the California Supreme Court issued another important ruling on California meal and rest period laws.
In Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that neither party may recover attorney’s fees on claims involving meal and rest periods. The Court analyzed the legislative history of the meal and rest period provisions and concluded, “We believe the most plausible inference to be drawn from history is that the Legislature intended [meal and rest period] claims to ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- NYDFS Cybersecurity Crackdown: New Requirements Now in Force—Are You Compliant?
- Video: New Tips and Overtime Guidance, NLRB Circuit Split, and Stalled Nomination - Employment Law This Week
- Companies and Employees Increasingly at Risk of AI-Powered Cyber Attacks
- Video: New Leadership and Priorities for the EEOC - Employment Law This Week
- Expanded Pay Transparency Requirements Coming to Columbus, Ohio