By Michael Kun
Yesterday, only weeks after its long-awaited Brinker v. Superior Court decision, the California Supreme Court issued another important ruling on California meal and rest period laws.
In Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that neither party may recover attorney’s fees on claims involving meal and rest periods. The Court analyzed the legislative history of the meal and rest period provisions and concluded, “We believe the most plausible inference to be drawn from history is that the Legislature intended [meal and rest period] claims to ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- DOJ Announces Initiative to Expand FCA Enforcement Into Alleged Discrimination
- Video: New Executive Order Targets Disparate Impact Claims Nationwide - Employment Law This Week
- EEOC Opens 2024 EEO-1 Reporting and the Deadline to File is Weeks Away
- Maryland Delays Start of Paid Family and Medical Leave Program
- Video: How Modern Workplaces Navigate Generational Shifts: One-on-One with Jeff Landes