Our colleagues at Epstein Becker Green have a resent post on the Wage and Hour Defense Blog that will be of interest to our readers in the retail industry: “California Supreme Court’s Clarification of De Minimis Doctrine Leaves Many Questions Unanswered – and Does Little to Ease Plaintiffs’ Path to Class Certification.”
On July 26, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Troester v. Starbucks Corporation, ostensibly clarifying the application of the widely adopted de minimis doctrine to ...
Our colleague at Epstein Becker Green has a post on the Wage and Hour Defense blog that will be of interest to our readers in the retail industry: “Federal Court Concludes That 7-Eleven Franchisees Are Not Employees of 7-Eleven.”
Following is an excerpt:
In November 2017, four convenience store franchisees brought suit in federal court against 7-Eleven, Inc., alleging that they and all other franchisees were employees of 7-Eleven. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entitled Haitayan, et al. v ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Video: How Modern Workplaces Navigate Generational Shifts: One-on-One with Jeff Landes
- Updated New York Retail Worker Safety Act Takes Effect Soon
- Video: Independent Contractor Rule, EEO-1 Reporting, and New York Labor Law Amendment - Employment Law This Week
- Colorado’s Historic AI Law Survives Without Delay (So Far)
- Disparate Impact Liability Under Fire