On September 6, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California preliminarily approved a settlement in Harvey v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. The significance of the result is two-fold. First, substantively, it is a reminder to financial services firms of potential liability under California labor law when advisors are required to pay for business expenses. Second, procedurally, the court’s approval of the settlement is edifying on the subject of parallel class actions.
In the Harvey case, plaintiffs challenged Morgan Stanley Smith Barney’s ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Video: Employment Law in 2026: What to Expect - Employment Law This Week
- When Your Data Sets Your Price: New York Takes on Algorithmic Pricing
- Artificial Intelligence Regulation at a Crossroads: The Trump Administration’s Preemption Push
- Your AI in HR Must-Do List: Navigating Illinois’ Draft AI Notice Regulations
- Video: Top Employment Law Changes of 2025 - Employment Law This Week