A recent New York state court decision granted a fairly unique petition to disqualify the attorney for a group of former employees from representing them in an intra-industry arbitration at FINRA. Why? Because the lawyer had turned himself into a fact witness by negotiating the termination explanation in the U5 notice of two of the employees. The decision raises an interesting question about whether the same logic could be applied in a U5 expungement hearing at FINRA when there have been discussions between counsel about the U5 language, regardless of whether ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Podcast: Can FTC’s Non-Compete Ban Survive Without Chevron Deference? – Employment Law This Week
- Video: Chevron Deference Overturned - Employment Law This Week
- California District Court Rules That Software Vendor Is Subject to Title VII, the ADA, the ADEA
- Pumping the Brakes: New York Seeks to Curb AI Acceleration in Labor Market
- Video: California Governor’s PAGA Deal: What Employers Need to Know - Employment Law This Week