Featured on Employment Law This Week: The Ninth Circuit held that certain auto service advisors were not exempt because their position is not specifically listed in the FLSA auto dealership exemption.
The 9th relied on the principle that such exemptions should be interpreted narrowly. In a 5-4 decision last week, the Supreme Court found no “textual indication” in the FLSA for narrow construction. Applying a “fair interpretation” standard instead, the Court ruled that the exemption applies to service advisors because of the nature of the work.
Watch the segment below ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- SEC Issues New Guidance Under Rule 701 for Employee Equity Compensation
- Video: NLRB and DOL Take Action on Joint Employer and Independent Contractor Rules - Employment Law This Week
- Massachusetts Court Rejects Individual Liability and Aiding-and-Abetting Claims Under Paid Family and Medical Leave Law
- Video: NYC Enforcement Blitz, CA Surveillance Pricing, and PA Criminal History Rule Update - Employment Law This Week
- EEOC Sends Warning to Fortune 500: What Employers Should Know