In the More Than 20 Federal and State Employment Trials She Handled, Only $1 Was Awarded to the Other Side. Meet Jessica Giambrone Palmese.
Most employment disputes never see the inside of a courtroom. But when they do, the attorney standing next to you matters more than you might think.
Jessica Giambrone Palmese is an Epstein Becker Green attorney whose record speaks for itself: lead counsel on 20 federal and state employment trials taken to verdict, nearly undefeated, and with a practice built on 17 years of litigating on behalf of New York City.
In this one-on-one conversation with fellow Epstein Becker Green attorney George Whipple, Jessica explains how that depth of experience shapes her approach to every case—whether it goes to trial or not.
When California Employment Law Feels Impossible, Jonathan Brenner Says “Watch Me”
Employers in California face a perfect storm of shifting regulations, multistate compliance headaches, and legal risks that can derail even the best human resources strategies. But what if there were a better way than always playing defense?
Meet Jonathan Brenner, the California employment attorney who’s built his practice on a radical idea—no problem is truly impossible. In this one-on-one conversation with fellow Epstein Becker Green attorney George Whipple, Jonathan pulls back the curtain on how sophisticated employers are navigating California’s legal minefield.
As another busy year for our Employment, Labor & Workforce Management clients came to a close, we asked our attorneys what issues were top of mind for our nationwide clients in 2025.
The results of this informal survey provide the opportunity not only to reflect on the challenges confronted by the global organizations we are privileged to represent, but also to prepare for what the legal landscape might hold in 2026.
Meet Jill Bigler, a dynamic employment attorney who blends litigation experience with practical insights to guide clients through complex workplace challenges.
In this one-on-one interview, Jill joins fellow Epstein Becker Green attorney George Whipple to discuss how her litigation background shapes her approach to drafting agreements and counseling clients. Drawing on her courtroom experience, Jill shares how she helps businesses anticipate outcomes, navigate such gray areas as Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations, and make informed decisions that balance legal risks with business objectives.
Jill also opens up about the emotional side of employment law, offering strategies for managing tensions between employers and employees. From leveraging mediation to resolve disputes, to helping clients separate emotions from business decisions, Jill’s approach emphasizes empathy, collaboration, and a clear-eyed strategy.
With a career rooted in practical problem-solving and a commitment to client success, Jill’s insights offer valuable guidance for navigating the ever-evolving landscape of employment law.
In employment litigation, plaintiffs often rely on the “cat’s paw” doctrine to hold their employers liable for discriminatory or retaliatory animus of a supervisory employee who influenced, but did not make, the ultimate employment decision. On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. Empress Ambulance Service, Inc., greatly extended the reach of the “cat’s paw,” holding that the doctrine could be applied to hold an employer liable for an adverse employment decision that was influenced by the discriminatory or ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Watch: Hemant Gupta Bridges the Gap Between Cutting-Edge Technology and Intellectual Property Protection
- A Proposed Overhaul to Federal Grantmaking: What It Could Mean for Grantees, Healthcare and Other Researchers, and Colleges and Universities
- Watch: Agencies Step Up DEI Scrutiny, DOL Clarifies Overtime Rules, and California Court Limits PAGA Claims - Employment Law This Week
- Virginia Pay Transparency Requirements Take Effect July 1, 2026
- Connecticut Joins Growing Number of States Regulating Workplace AI and Mandating Notice for Certain AI Uses as Well as Imposing New Disclosure Requirements for Certain Reductions in Force