Employees who resign from work, sue their employer, and assert “constructive discharge” shoulder a heavy burden to demonstrate that they had no choice but to resign. A recent decision of the Massachusetts Appeals Court, Armato v. Town of Stoneham, shows just how heavy that burden is.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Video: What Restoring a Quorum at the NLRB Could Mean for Employers - Employment Law This Week
- Video: H-1B Enforcement Tightened, Fertility Benefits Expanded, Gender Identity Protection Setback - Employment Law This Week
- Ohio Enacts Mini-WARN Act: What Employers Need to Know
- Video: Top Employment Insights: 44th Annual Workforce Management Briefing - Employment Law This Week
- Pay Equity in New York City: New Employer Reporting Obligations Likely Coming Soon