In employment litigation, plaintiffs often rely on the “cat’s paw” doctrine to hold their employers liable for discriminatory or retaliatory animus of a supervisory employee who influenced, but did not make, the ultimate employment decision. On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. Empress Ambulance Service, Inc., greatly extended the reach of the “cat’s paw,” holding that the doctrine could be applied to hold an employer liable for an adverse employment decision that was influenced by the discriminatory or ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- NYDFS Cybersecurity Crackdown: New Requirements Now in Force—Are You Compliant?
- Video: New Tips and Overtime Guidance, NLRB Circuit Split, and Stalled Nomination - Employment Law This Week
- Companies and Employees Increasingly at Risk of AI-Powered Cyber Attacks
- Video: New Leadership and Priorities for the EEOC - Employment Law This Week
- Expanded Pay Transparency Requirements Coming to Columbus, Ohio