As featured in #WorkforceWednesday: This week, we look at two U.S. Supreme Court decisions and legislation in California with major implications for employers and health care providers.
Our colleagues at Epstein Becker Green have a resent post on the Wage and Hour Defense Blog that will be of interest to our readers in the retail industry: “California Supreme Court’s Clarification of De Minimis Doctrine Leaves Many Questions Unanswered – and Does Little to Ease Plaintiffs’ Path to Class Certification.”
On July 26, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Troester v. Starbucks Corporation, ostensibly clarifying the application of the widely adopted de minimis doctrine to ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Watch: EEO-1 Reports, Remote Work, and Non-Compete Restrictions in Tennessee - Employment Law This Week
- Chicago Paid Leave Rules Clarified and Now in Effect
- Chicago Recalibrates Fair Workweek Rules, Which Took Effect June 1
- Illinois’ Proposed Notice Rules for Complying with Workplace AI Anti-Discrimination Law
- Inside Colorado’s Senate Bill 26-189: Impacts and Implications for Employers