Where is the impact of alleged employment discrimination? That is the question when evaluating whether a remote worker can assert claims under the New York State Human Rights Law (“NYSHRL”) and New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”), according to a recent decision by U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos. Relying on state law, Judge Ramos concluded that the basis for subject matter jurisdiction has not changed during the COVID-19 pandemic and remains grounded in New York’s “Impact Test,” meaning courts will look to where the impact of alleged discriminatory conduct was felt. Thus, regardless of whether an employer is located in New York, the anti-discrimination laws are intended to protect employees who live or work in New York.
On March 3, 2021, New York City Mayor Bill DeBlasio issued Executive Order No. 64 (“EO”), which, effective immediately, imposes new sexual harassment reporting requirements on “human services” providers who contract with the City. The EO requires the Department of Investigation (“DOI”) to review information about sexual harassment complaints and provide its findings to any City agency that contracts with the disclosing provider.
“Human services” is defined by the relevant section of the Administrative Code to include “day care, foster care, home care ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Video: H-1B Enforcement Tightened, Fertility Benefits Expanded, Gender Identity Protection Setback - Employment Law This Week
- Ohio Enacts Mini-WARN Act: What Employers Need to Know
- Video: Top Employment Insights: 44th Annual Workforce Management Briefing - Employment Law This Week
- Pay Equity in New York City: New Employer Reporting Obligations Likely Coming Soon
- Video: State Law Trends, “Captive Audience” Ban Clash, Rhode Island Menopause Law - Employment Law This Week