<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://www.workforcebulletin.com/rss.xsl' ?>
			<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'
					xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
					xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
				<channel>
					<title>Workforce Bulletin - Insights on Labor and Employment Law | Epstein Becker
Green</title>
					<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/author/nancy-gunzenhauser-popper</link>
					<atom:link href='https://www.workforcebulletin.com/author/nancy-gunzenhauser-popper?rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
					<description><![CDATA[The latest updates to Workforce Bulletin - Insights on Labor and Employment Law.]]></description>
					<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:30:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
					
				<item>
				<title>New York Legislation Watch: Five Bills Employers Should Have on Their Radar</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/new-york-legislation-watch-five-bills-employers-should-have-on-their-radar</link>
<dc:creator>Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper, Katherine  Heaney</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>new-york-legislation-watch-five-bills-employers-should-have-on-their-radar</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 09:00:01 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>With the 2025-2026 legislative session now over, the New York State Senate and Assembly recently passed a handful of bills that, if enacted, would significantly impact New York State employers. Although approved by both chambers of the Legislature, laws are not enacted until presented to and acted upon by Governor Kathy Hochul. While it&rsquo;s not a sure thing that the Governor will approve all of these measures, it&rsquo;s wise to be aware and prepare for these potential changes.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>New York’s Trapped at Work Act, in Effect for Now, but New Bill Aims to
Amend Terms and Extend Effective Date</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/new-yorks-trapped-at-work-act-in-effect-for-now-but-new-bill-aims-to-amend-terms-and-extend-effective-date</link>
<dc:creator>Drew C. Ambrose, Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>new-yorks-trapped-at-work-act-in-effect-for-now-but-new-bill-aims-to-amend-terms-and-extend-effective-date</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 14:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>[Update (2/17/26):</em></strong> <strong><a href="https://www.ebglaw.com/insights/publications/new-yorks-trapped-at-work-act-governor-signs-amendment-into-law">New York&rsquo;s Trapped at Work Act&mdash;Governor Signs Amendment into Law</a>]</strong></p>
<p>On January 6, 2026, the New York Assembly introduced bill <a href="https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/A9452">A9452</a> (Amendment), which would substantially amend the &ldquo;Trapped at Work Act&rdquo; (<a href="https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/A37">TAWA</a>). As we explained <a href="https://www.ebglaw.com/insights/publications/new-york-labor-and-employment-legislation-governor-hochul-acts-on-four-bills-before-year-end">here</a>, TAWA prohibits all employers&mdash;including subsidiaries and contractors&mdash;from requiring current or prospective workers to sign employment-related promissory notes as a condition of employment.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Epstein Becker Green’s Employment Law 2025 Highlight Reel: 10 Issues That
Dominated—and What’s Lurking in 2026</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/epstein-becker-greens-employment-law-2025-highlight-reel-10-issues-that-dominated-and-whats-lurking-in-2026</link>
<dc:creator>Susan Gross  Sholinsky, Frances M. Green, Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>epstein-becker-greens-employment-law-2025-highlight-reel-10-issues-that-dominated-and-whats-lurking-in-2026</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 16:08:00 -0800</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>As another busy year for our <a href="https://www.ebglaw.com/services/employment-labor-workforce-management">Employment, Labor &amp; Workforce Management</a> clients came to a close, we asked our attorneys what issues were top of mind for our nationwide clients in 2025.</p>
<p>The results of this informal survey provide the opportunity not only to reflect on the challenges confronted by the global organizations we are privileged to represent, but also to prepare for what the legal landscape might hold in 2026.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>New York Employers: Prepare for Paid Family Leave Adjustments for 2026</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/new-york-employers-prepare-for-paid-family-leave-adjustments-for-2026</link>
<dc:creator>Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper, Genevieve M. Murphy-Bradacs, Joseph  Ramesar</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>new-york-employers-prepare-for-paid-family-leave-adjustments-for-2026</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 09:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>New York is once again updating its New York Paid Family Leave (PFL) program &ndash; the state managed insurance program that provides partial wage replacement for eligible employees who take time off to:</p>
<ul>
<li>bond with a child,</li>
<li>care for a family member with a serious health condition, or</li>
<li>deal with the deployment or active duty of a family member in military service.</li>
</ul>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>New York City Council to Mayor: Not So Fast!—Overrides Pay Equity Vetoes</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/new-york-city-council-to-mayor-not-so-fast-overrides-pay-equity-vetoes</link>
<dc:creator>Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper, Eric I. Emanuelson, Jr., Adam  Loch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>new-york-city-council-to-mayor-not-so-fast-overrides-pay-equity-vetoes</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 13:10:00 -0800</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p class="introText">On December 4, 2025, the New York City Council voted&mdash;by more than a two-thirds majority&mdash;to override Mayor Eric Adams&rsquo; veto of two bills requiring certain businesses to annually report pay data and directing New York City to conduct pay equity studies using that information.</p> <p>The City Council originally passed the bills on October 9, 2025, as we <a href="https://www.workforcebulletin.com/pay-equity-in-new-york-city-new-employer-reporting-obligations-likely-coming-soon">explained here</a>. Citing concerns about the bills&rsquo; clarity and fearing inaccurate reporting from businesses, Mayor Adams vetoed the bills on November 7.</p> <p>The Council&rsquo;s action sets in motion the creation of the pay reporting scheme, but&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Pay Equity in New York City: New Employer Reporting Obligations Likely
Coming Soon</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/pay-equity-in-new-york-city-new-employer-reporting-obligations-likely-coming-soon</link>
<dc:creator>Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper, Eric I. Emanuelson, Jr., Adam  Loch</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>pay-equity-in-new-york-city-new-employer-reporting-obligations-likely-coming-soon</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:05:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a letter notifying the City Council of his disapproval of the bills, Mayor Adams noted the &ldquo;serious operational concerns&rdquo; that could arise for the agency designated to enforce the pay data reporting law and expressed doubts about the bill&rsquo;s clarity regarding which City businesses it covers. He also raised reservations about allowing businesses to report anonymously under the law, writing that the anonymity would &ldquo;[disincentivize] respondents from providing accurate information while also stymieing any effort by the City to address potentially illegal pay practices.&rdquo; The Mayor concluded by asserting that the &ldquo;costs to the City and businesses operating here . . . outweigh any potential benefit this law may create.&rdquo;</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Someone Wants Your Employee Fired. What (Not) to Do.</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/someone-wants-your-employee-fired-what-not-to-do</link>
<dc:creator>Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper, Lauri F. Rasnick, Susan Gross  Sholinsky</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>someone-wants-your-employee-fired-what-not-to-do</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:50:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Recent violence and political discord have led to a marked increase in social media activity. With that has come a new viral trend; let&rsquo;s call it <em>termination trolling</em>. Influencers and activists have been amplifying social media posts calling for people to get fired based on their social commentary. One group claims to have located more than 50,000 posts that, in its view, should be grounds for employment termination.</p>
<p>A number of employers have publicly dismissed employees (either on their own or in response to public pressure) after becoming aware of their social media comments or posts. Given the volume of posts and efforts to get people fired based on their social media posts or other comments, employers should prepare to manage such demands.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Illinois Leads the Charge in Military Leave by Adopting Paid Funeral Honors
Detail Leave</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/illinois-leads-the-charge-in-military-leave-by-adopting-paid-funeral-honors-detail-leave</link>
<dc:creator>Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>illinois-leads-the-charge-in-military-leave-by-adopting-paid-funeral-honors-detail-leave</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 15:15:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Eligible Illinois employees are now entitled to up to 40 hours of paid leave annually to serve on military funeral honors detail thanks to an <a href="https://ilga.gov/Documents/Legislation/PublicActs/104/PDF/104-0078.pdf?c2bd2evn0a">amendment</a> (the &ldquo;Amendment&rdquo;) to Illinois&rsquo;s Military Leave Act that Governor Pritzker signed on August 1, 2025. The new law benefits qualified employees of Illinois employers with more than 50 employees and took immediate effect to allow paid leave for those qualified to participate in a military funeral honor guard.</p>
<p>The Amendment limits the benefit to those who are qualified to participate in a &ldquo;Funeral Honors Detail,&rdquo; an honor guard detail provided for the funeral of any veteran in compliance with federal regulations. A Funeral Honors Detail performs specified services at a veteran&rsquo;s funeral ceremony, such as folding the United States flag and presenting it to the veteran&rsquo;s family, or playing &ldquo;Taps&rdquo; at a veteran&rsquo;s funeral.</p>
<p>The Amendment applies to Illinois employers with at least 51 employees, but it is silent as to whether this count includes employees beyond the state&rsquo;s borders. Covered employers must provide at least eight hours of paid military funeral honors detail leave (&ldquo;Funeral Honors Detail Leave&rdquo;) per month, up to 40 hours per calendar year, to qualified employees.</p>
]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>The Last One Standing: The Sun Finally Sets on COVID Leave in New York</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/the-last-one-standing-the-sun-finally-sets-on-covid-leave-in-new-york</link>
<dc:creator>Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper, Katherine  Heaney</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>the-last-one-standing-the-sun-finally-sets-on-covid-leave-in-new-york</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 16:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>New York State enacted the first state law requiring all employers to provide <a href="https://www.ebglaw.com/insights/publications/new-york-enacts-law-providing-leave-benefits-to-employees-affected-by-covid-19">leave for reasons related to COVID-19</a> in March 2020.</p>
<p>The extra paid sick days and &ldquo;<a href="https://paidfamilyleave.ny.gov/new-york-paid-family-leave-covid-19-faqs">COVID-19 &nbsp;quarantine benefits</a>,&rdquo; however, are scheduled to end on July 31, 2025, when New York becomes the last U.S. jurisdiction to roll back COVID-era leave entitlements.</p>
<p>As one of the first states heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, New York pioneered a paid benefit to employees impacted by the virus. The budget bill (which was also responsible for enacting the statewide <a href="https://www.ny.gov/programs/new-york-paid-sick-leave">Paid Sick Leave law</a>) passed in the early weeks of the 2020 lockdown, requiring New York employers to provide protected, paid sick leave to employees who are under a mandatory quarantine or isolation order due to COVID-19 and cannot work remotely, separate and in addition to other paid sick and safe leave benefits required under New York Law. The amount of mandated paid leave varied based on the size of the employer, requiring up to 14 days of paid leave from the largest employers.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Missouri Rolls Back Paid Sick Leave Entitlement; $15 Minimum Wage Remains</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/missouri-rolls-back-paid-sick-leave-entitlement-15-minimum-wage-remains</link>
<dc:creator>Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper, Gretel  Zumwalt</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>missouri-rolls-back-paid-sick-leave-entitlement-15-minimum-wage-remains</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 09:40:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Only two months after Missouri&rsquo;s statewide paid sick and safe time law became effective, Governor Mike Kehoe signed <a href="https://house.mo.gov/bill.aspx?bill=HB567&amp;year=2025&amp;code=R">House Bill 567</a>, which will repeal the earned paid sick time benefit effective August 28, 2025.</p>
<p>As we <a href="https://www.ebglaw.com/insights/publications/paid-sick-leave-is-coming-to-alaska-missouri-and-nebraska-in-2025">previously reported</a>, Missouri was one of three states to adopt a sick leave obligation for private employers, adopted through ballot measures during the 2024 election. By commencing leave accrual and usage on May 1, 2025, Missouri was the first of the three states to require private employers to provide paid sick time to all employees within the state. Currently, Missouri employers must provide one hour of paid sick and safe leave (PSSL) for every 30 hours worked.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>No Ultimatums: New York State Lawmakers Contemplate New Mandatory
Provisions for Severance Agreements</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/no-ultimatums-new-york-state-lawmakers-contemplate-new-mandatory-provisions-for-severance-agreements</link>
<dc:creator>Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper, Alexandra  Bruno Carlo, Gretel  Zumwalt</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>no-ultimatums-new-york-state-lawmakers-contemplate-new-mandatory-provisions-for-severance-agreements</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 10:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On March 4, 2025, the New York Senate passed <a href="https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S372">Senate Bill S372</a> (the &ldquo;No Severance Ultimatums Act&rdquo; or &ldquo;S372&rdquo;). If enacted, S372 would add a new section to the New York Labor Law requiring New York employers to provide for a 21-business day review period and a seven-day revocation period in all severance agreements. Currently, similar protections are afforded to employees who are over the age of 40 pursuant to the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA), which amends the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). <a href="https://www.ebglaw.com/insights/publications/new-york-further-restricts-agreements-involving-claims-of-discrimination-harassment-or-retaliation">Similar protections</a> are also available to New York employees who enter into agreements settling claims of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation, but only if the agreement contains a non-disclosure provision relating to those claims.</p>
<h2>Specific Requirements Under Consideration</h2>
<p>Under the terms of S372, any severance agreement offered to an employee or former employee will need to:</p>
<ul>
<li>contain a notice advising the employee of their right to consult an attorney regarding the agreement;</li>
<li>provide at least 21 business days for review of the agreement; and,</li>
<li>acknowledge a seven-day period within which the employee may revoke the agreement.</li>
</ul>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>New York’s Reproductive Health Handbook Notice Requirement Reinstated</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/new-yorks-reproductive-health-handbook-notice-requirement-reinstated</link>
<dc:creator>Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper, Eric I. Emanuelson, Jr.</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>new-yorks-reproductive-health-handbook-notice-requirement-reinstated</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Don&rsquo;t finalize your 2025 handbooks just yet! On January 2, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit <a href="https://ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/561fbf11-1255-4cc8-ada7-7ba2baefb67e/1/doc/22-951_opn.pdf#xml=https://ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/561fbf11-1255-4cc8-ada7-7ba2baefb67e/1/hilite/">vacated</a> a permanent injunction, which had blocked a requirement that New York employers with employee handbooks include a notice against discrimination based on reproductive health care choices. As a result, handbooks covering New York employees must <em>again</em> include such notices.</p>
<p>The notice requirement originates from a series of legislation intended to protect reproductive health rights enacted on November 8, 2019. As we previously <a href="https://www.ebglaw.com/insights/publications/new-york-law-prohibits-discrimination-based-on-employees-reproductive-health-decisions">reported</a>, one of the bills (<a href="https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2019/A584">A584</a>/<a href="https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2019/S660">S660</a>) added Section 203-e to the New York labor law, which prohibits employers from discriminating against employees based on an employee&rsquo;s or their dependents&rsquo; sexual and reproductive health choices, including their choice to use or access a particular drug, device, or medical service. The law also prohibits employers from accessing such information without prior consent, and directed New York employers with employee handbooks to include a notice of employee rights and remedies. Although the law took effect immediately upon passage, a second bill (<a href="https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2019/s4413">S4413</a>) delayed the effective date of the notice requirement until January 2020.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>New York Paid Family Leave Benefits and Employee Contribution Rates and
Caps Set to Increase in 2025</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/new-york-paid-family-leave-benefits-and-employee-contribution-rates-and-caps-set-to-increase-in-2025</link>
<dc:creator>Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper, Genevieve M. Murphy-Bradacs, Isabel  Wolf</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>new-york-paid-family-leave-benefits-and-employee-contribution-rates-and-caps-set-to-increase-in-2025</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 09:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>With 2024 winding down, New York employers should be aware of the <a href="https://paidfamilyleave.ny.gov/2025">updates</a> to the New York State Paid Family Leave (PFL) program that take effect in 2025.</p>
<p>As a reminder, PFL allows eligible employees to take up to 12 weeks of job-protected, partially paid time off within a 52-week period for permitted reasons, such as to bond with a newborn, care for a family member with a serious health condition or assist when a family member is deployed abroad on active military service.</p>
<p>As we noted in a <a href="https://www.workforcebulletin.com/new-york-paid-family-leave-benefits-and-contribution-rates-changing-again-in-2024">bulletin post</a> last year, New York has modified its program several times since establishing PFL in 2018. While PFL&rsquo;s changes for 2025, as explained below, are ministerial, it should be noted that New York recently expanded other mandatory benefits, including the provision of <a href="https://www.workforcebulletin.com/act-now-new-york-employers-must-provide-paid-lactation-breaks-to-employees">paid lactation breaks</a> and the addition of <a href="https://www.workforcebulletin.com/video-dols-expanded-overtime-salary-limits-eeocs-sexual-harassment-guidance-nys-mandatory-paid-prenatal-leave-employment-law-this-week">paid leave for prenatal care</a> under the New York paid sick leave program.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Law Decision</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/michigan-supreme-court-clarifies-minimum-wage-law-decision</link>
<dc:creator>Adam S. Forman, Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>michigan-supreme-court-clarifies-minimum-wage-law-decision</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 10:40:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>We previously wrote about a <a href="https://www.wagehourblog.com/michigans-supreme-court-has-spoken-expanded-paid-sick-leave-increased-minimum-wage-and-phased-out-tip-credits">Michigan Supreme Court decision</a> to reinstate two voter initiatives &ndash; the Wage Act and the Earned Sick Time Act (ESTA) &ndash; and <a href="https://www.workforcebulletin.com/mi-agencies-request-clarity-on-new-minimum-wage-tip-credit-requirements">state agency responses</a> to that <a href="https://www.courts.michigan.gov/4a509f/siteassets/case-documents/uploads/opinions/final/sct/165325_115_01.pdf">decision</a> (the &ldquo;Original Order&rdquo;), which included the filing of a <a href="https://www.michigan.gov/leo/-/media/Project/Websites/leo/Documents/URL-needed/FILED-Mothering-Justice-mot4clarif.pdf?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=govdelivery">motion</a> asking the court to clarify the Original Order. On September 18, 2024, the Michigan Supreme Court responded, granting the request for immediate consideration and issuing a thirteen-page <a href="https://www.courts.michigan.gov/4a6c1f/siteassets/case-documents/uploads/sct/public/orders/165325-2024-09-18-or.pdf">Order</a> (the &ldquo;Clarification Order&rdquo;).</p>
<h2>New Details on Coming Adjustments to Michigan Wage Rates</h2>
<h3><em>Tip Credit Phase Out</em></h3>
<p>The substantive portion of the Clarification Order re-writes a lengthy and important footnote in the Original Order, including an extension of the gradual phase-out of the tip credit and a clearer definition of the annually increasing percentage amount. Instead of merely saying &ldquo;The tip credit will be [XX]% of minimum wage,&rdquo; the Clarification Order provides that &ldquo;tipped workers&rsquo; minimum hourly wage rate must be at least [XX]% of the general minimum wage rate, and the tip credit can be used to satisfy the balance owed to such workers.&rdquo;</p>
<p>In other words, the Clarification Order spells out that, for example, &ldquo;80%&rdquo; means that tipped workers must be paid a base rate that is at least 80% of the general minimum hourly wage rate.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Ban-the-Box Measures Headed for the Financial Services Industry</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/ban-the-box-measures-headed-for-the-financial-services-industry</link>
<dc:creator>Susan Gross  Sholinsky, Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper, Laura E. Holtan</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>ban-the-box-measures-headed-for-the-financial-services-industry</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, advocates and lawmakers have been pushing to expand the reach of &ldquo;ban-the-box&rdquo; measures designed to remove job barriers for individuals with criminal convictions. &ldquo;Ban-the-box&rdquo; laws, also called &ldquo;fair chance laws,&rdquo; are designed to prevent employers from excluding applicants based on their criminal history alone, by prohibiting employers from immediately inquiring into an applicant&rsquo;s criminal history before evaluating their qualifications.</p>
<p>Ban-the-box laws have been adopted <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/09/01/2023-18242/fair-chance-to-compete-for-jobs">federally</a> (for federal agencies and federal contractors acting on their behalf) and in numerous states and <a href="https://www.workforcebulletin.com/fair-chance-updates-los-angeles-county-ordinance-takes-effect-new-york-city-proposes-amendments-to-existing-law">local jurisdictions</a>. These laws generally contain broad carve-outs for employers or positions where background checks are required, including within the financial services industry. Some changes are coming to narrow those exemptions. On December 23, 2022, President Biden signed into law the <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5911">Fair Hiring in Banking Act</a> (FHBA), which substantially revised Section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA) to reduce hiring barriers within the financial services sector.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Rules That Secretly Recording
Co-Workers Dooms Retaliation Claim</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/court-of-appeals-for-the-tenth-circuit-rules-that-secretly-recording-co-workers-dooms-retaliation-claim</link>
<dc:creator>Laura E. Holtan, Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper, Susan Gross  Sholinsky</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>court-of-appeals-for-the-tenth-circuit-rules-that-secretly-recording-co-workers-dooms-retaliation-claim</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><em>The Tenth Circuit recently reaffirmed that employers may lawfully enforce a policy against surreptitious recordings.</em></p>
<p>In <a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/010111073773.pdf"><em>Spagnolia v. Charter Communications, LLC</em></a>, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit unanimously affirmed a District of Colorado order granting employer Charter Communications, LLC&rsquo;s (&ldquo;Defendant&rdquo;) summary judgment on claims filed by plaintiff Heather Spagnolia (&ldquo;Spagnolia&rdquo;), who asserted that she was fired in retaliation for making reasonable requests for lactation accommodations. The issue before the appellate court was whether Defendant&rsquo;s proffered reason for terminating Spagnolia (secretly recording meetings with her supervisors in violation of company policy) was pretextual.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Both courts agreed that Spagnolia&rsquo;s violation of the policy against surreptitious recordings was a lawful basis for termination, and that Spagnolia failed to show that this was pretextual.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>In 2017, Spagnolia moved to Colorado to work for Defendant as a Regional Operations Center Specialist. From April to July 2019, Spagnolia took leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act to give birth to her second child. When she returned to work in July 2019, Spagnolia&rsquo;s supervisor mistakenly permitted her to take paid lactation breaks, even though Defendant&rsquo;s written policy provided for unpaid lactation breaks. During that time, Spagnolia&rsquo;s lactation breaks lasted for an average of two hours per day, and sometimes up to three hours&mdash;in addition to her lunch break and regular paid breaks.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>MI Agencies Request Clarity on New Minimum Wage &amp; Tip Credit Requirements</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/mi-agencies-request-clarity-on-new-minimum-wage-tip-credit-requirements</link>
<dc:creator>Adam S. Forman, Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>mi-agencies-request-clarity-on-new-minimum-wage-tip-credit-requirements</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:40:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On August 22, 2024, the Michigan Department of Labor &amp; Economic Opportunity (LEO) issued a press release on the heels of the <em>Mothering Justice</em> decision, about which we <a href="https://www.wagehourblog.com/michigans-supreme-court-has-spoken-expanded-paid-sick-leave-increased-minimum-wage-and-phased-out-tip-credits">previously wrote</a>, and which will drastically change the minimum wage, tip credit, and paid sick leave obligations for Michigan employers.</p>
<p>With respect to paid sick leave, LEO announced that it issued new <a href="https://www.michigan.gov/leo/bureaus-agencies/ber/wage-and-hour/paid-medical-leave-act?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=govdelivery">guidance</a> and <a href="https://www.michigan.gov/leo/bureaus-agencies/ber/wage-and-hour/paid-medical-leave-act/frequently-asked-questions--faqs">FAQs</a> on the Earned Sick Time Act, which goes into effect on February 21, 2025. We will be publishing an <em>Insight</em> shortly detailing all the mandatory changes.</p>
<p>With respect to the minimum wage and tip credit changes, on August 21, the state of Michigan&rsquo;s Attorney General, LEO, and the Department of Treasury asked the Michigan Supreme Court for clarification on how the Treasurer should calculate adjustments for inflation to set new minimum wage rates, as directed by the July 31 decision. The <a href="https://www.michigan.gov/leo/-/media/Project/Websites/leo/Documents/URL-needed/FILED-Mothering-Justice-mot4clarif.pdf?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=govdelivery">motion</a> outlines a proposed schedule of new minimum wages based on one interpretation of the Supreme Court&rsquo;s order, but suggests that ambiguity in the order leaves room for interpretation and therefore lays out five options:</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Changes Coming in 2025 to Michigan Minimum Wage, Tip Credit, and Earned
Sick Time</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/changes-coming-in-2025-to-michigan-minimum-wage-tip-credit-and-earned-sick-time</link>
<dc:creator>Adam S. Forman, Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>changes-coming-in-2025-to-michigan-minimum-wage-tip-credit-and-earned-sick-time</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 14:15:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Michigan Supreme Court has written the latest, and perhaps last, chapter of an ongoing saga affecting most Michigan employers. In <a href="https://www.courts.michigan.gov/4a2778/siteassets/case-documents/uploads/opinions/final/sct/165325_115_01.pdf"><em>Mothering Justice v. Attorney General</em></a>, the Michigan Supreme Court fully restored sweeping minimum wage and paid sick leave laws, bringing finality to a legal controversy that has been churning since the laws were first proposed in 2018. Pursuant to that decision, the laws will take full effect in their original form, about six months from now, on February 21, 2025.</p>
<h2>How We Got Here</h2>
<p>In 2018, labor advocacy groups presented the Michigan legislature with two voter initiatives related to minimum wage (the Improved Workforce Opportunity Wage Act (IWOWA)) and paid sick leave (the Earned Sick Time Act (ESTA)) through the state&rsquo;s citizen initiative process. Michigan&rsquo;s constitution allows voter initiatives to propose legislation, and the legislature may take one of these three actions: (1) adopt &ldquo;without change or amendment&rdquo;; (2) reject and place the proposed legislation on the ballot; or (3) reject and propose an amendment, placing both on the ballot. As we <a href="https://www.wagehourblog.com/michigan-court-stays-minimum-wage-increase-and-sick-pay-change-until-february-2023">previously explained</a>, the Legislature quickly enacted amended versions of the IWOWA (<a href="https://legislature.mi.gov/Bills/Bill?ObjectName=2018-SB-1171">2018 PA 368</a>) and the ESTA, which was renamed the Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA) (<a href="https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Bills/Bill?ObjectName=2018-SB-1175">2018 PA 369</a>), with significant changes. As we detailed <a href="https://www.workforcebulletin.com/michigan-employers-need-not-amend-their-paid-sick-leave-policies-and-hourly-wages">here</a>, the amended versions of these laws were less burdensome to employers.</p>
<p>The legislature&rsquo;s actions led the initiatives&rsquo; advocates to file a legal action challenging the lawmakers&rsquo; authority to modify a voter initiative so quickly and dramatically through a process labeled &ldquo;adopt and amend.&rdquo; &nbsp;That lawsuit has wended its way through Michigan&rsquo;s courts, with the final outcome decided on July 31, 2024, echoing that of the initial holding issued in 2022: the Michigan legislature&rsquo;s adoption-and-amendment of the two initiatives violated the State constitution&rsquo;s provision on voter initiatives. Hence, those amendments are void as unconstitutional and the laws as originally conceived should take effect.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>New York City Prohibits Provisions Shortening Statutes of Limitations for
Complaints and Civil Actions Related to Discrimination, Harassment, or
Violence</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/new-york-city-prohibits-provisions-shortening-statutes-of-limitations-for-complaints-and-civil-actions-related-to-discrimination-harassment-or-violence</link>
<dc:creator>Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper, Brittany J. Finder</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>new-york-city-prohibits-provisions-shortening-statutes-of-limitations-for-complaints-and-civil-actions-related-to-discrimination-harassment-or-violence</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 12:10:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>The New York City Council recently amended Sections 8-109 and 8-502 of the New York City Administrative Code, directly affecting employment agreements. &nbsp;</p>
<p>Under the New York City Human Rights Law (<a href="https://www.nyc.gov/site/cchr/law/text-of-the-law.page">NYCHRL</a>), employees have one year to file a complaint or claim with the New York City Commission on Human Rights (NYCCHR) for unlawful discriminatory practices or acts of discriminatory harassment or violence. Employees have three years to file a claim of gender-based harassment. The statute of limitations for commencing a civil action under the NYCHRL is three years.</p>
<p>Effective May 11, 2024, the amendments to Sections 8-109 and 8-502 of the NYCHRL prohibit provisions in employment agreements that shorten these statutory periods for filing complaints or claims with the NYCCHR or commencing civil actions under the NYCHRL. Below we outline the key implications of this new law for employers.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Act Now: New York Employers Must Provide Paid Lactation Breaks to Employees</title>
				<link>https://www.workforcebulletin.com/act-now-new-york-employers-must-provide-paid-lactation-breaks-to-employees</link>
<dc:creator>Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>act-now-new-york-employers-must-provide-paid-lactation-breaks-to-employees</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 11:25:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>New York State has long required employers to support working mothers by providing certain accommodations for nursing employees. Last year, the State imposed a written lactation accommodation policy requirement on all employers, following the lead of New York City and California (among other jurisdictions) [see our <em>Insight</em> on the lactation accommodation legislation <a href="https://www.ebglaw.com/insights/publications/new-york-state-act-would-bolster-employees-lactation-rights-in-the-workplace">here</a>]. As of June 19, 2024, employers&rsquo; obligations have again expanded: all New York State employers must provide 30 minutes of <strong>paid</strong> break time for employees to express breast milk for their nursing child for up to three years following the child&rsquo;s birth.</p>
<p>The obligations are prescribed by an amendment to the State&rsquo;s breastmilk expression law, <a href="https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/206-C">New York Labor Law &sect; 206-C</a> (the &ldquo;Law&rdquo;), which was enacted as <a href="https://nyassembly.gov/2024budget/bills2024/enacted/A8806c.pdf">part of a package of legislation</a> accompanying the New York State Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, signed into law on April 20, 2024 by New York Governor Kathy Hochul. Shortly before the Law took effect, the New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL) <a href="https://dol.ny.gov/expressing-breast-milk-workplace">published new materials</a> under the headline &ldquo;Breast Milk Expression in the Workplace,&rdquo; including general information about the Law, a policy statement, information sheets for employees and employers, and frequently asked questions (FAQs).</p>]]></description>
</item>

			</channel></rss>