Categories: OSHA

Following the announcement last week of the first ever Deferred Prosecution Agreement in an OSHA matter, the Editor of the Corporate Crime Reporter interviewed Eric J. Conn, Head of Epstein Becker Green's national OSHA Practice Group, who was involved in the matter, about OSHA enforcement trends in general, and OSHA criminal prosecutions in particular.

Based on that interview, Corporate Crime Reporter ran an article entitled Epstein Becker Partner Eric Conn On the Rise of OSHA Enforcement.  Here are some excerpts from the article:

"'OSHA enforcement is up in every measurable metric, from number of inspections, to inspections resulting in citations, citations per inspection, average penalty per violation, average penalty per inspection, number of significant cases (cases with $100,000 penalties or more), and million dollar cases,' Conn told Corporate Crime Reporter in an interview last week.  'Every measure you can think of — it is all up and it is all up somewhat significantly since 2009.'”

"And Conn is seeing an increase in activity when it comes to criminal enforcement of Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) cases.  'Historically, you almost never saw criminal enforcement,' Conn said. 'There might have been one or two cases a year since the OSH Act was passed 40 years ago. In that time, there have been over 400,000 workplace fatalities, but fewer than 80 OSH Act cases have been criminally prosecuted. . . .  But in the last five years, we have seen much more interest by U.S. Attorneys in these cases. They are taking them up more actively. And as a result, we are seeing more criminal settlements — plea deals, or other possible resolutions that come before an actual prosecution.'”

The article also touched on other controversial OSHA enforcement policies, such as OSHA's program of "Regulation by Shaming" and the "Severe Violator Enforcement Program."

Click here for the full article.

Back to Workforce Bulletin Blog

Search This Blog

Blog Editors

Related Services

Topics

Archives

Jump to Page

Subscribe

Sign up to receive an email notification when new Workforce Bulletin posts are published:

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.